Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Germany’ Category

When Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel claimed in March 2008 to the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, that the protection of Israel’s right to exist is part of Germany’s raison d’état (“Die[se] historische Verantwortung Deutschlands ist Teil der Staatsräson meines Landes. Das heißt, die Sicherheit Israels ist für mich als deutsche Bundeskanzlerin niemals verhandelbar”)  it wasn’t very clear how far she actually wanted to go when mentioning Iran, again, and its claimed nuclear weapons program as imminent threat for Israel. The context was the Shoah and Germany’s historic shame. Another knee-jerk genuflection, inevitable for any honorable German visiting Germany’s eternal victims. (It is interesting to learn that her controversial remark of Israel’s right to exist being Germany’s reason of state cannot be found on her personal webpage).

When recently visiting Israel, new Federal President Joachim Gauck was somewhat more precise when cautioning Israel against war with Iran.

Well, when in May 2012 Germany sold several Dolphin-class submarines to Israel, it was already speculated that they can and would in fact carry nukes.  Der Spiegel has it today that Israel in fact deploys nuclear weapons on these submarines. Former State Secretary Lothar Rühl and former chief of the planning staff Hans Rühle, have told the magazine that “they had always assumed that Israel would deploy nuclear weapons on the submarines. Rühl had even discussed the issue with the military in Tel Aviv.”

Israel, not a member of the Nuclear Non-proliferation treaty, does not comment officially on its nuclear weapons program. The German government has knowledge about it since 1961, though. According to Der Spiegel,

“Merkel had tied the delivery of the sixth submarine to a number of conditions, including a demand that Israel stop its expansionist settlement policy and allow the completion of a sewage treatment plant in the Gaza Strip, which is partially financed with German money. So far, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has met none of the terms.”

Last modified June 7, 2012.

Read Full Post »

What must be said? Well, many of us have been busy for years to prevent another war in the Middle East, after a decade of failure in Afghanistan and two decades of the Iraqi war debacle.

Literature Nobel laureate of 1999 Günter Grass has done a terrible disservice to our consistent work. Did he raise his voice before? As an eminent German writer, had he ever something to say on the Kunduz airstrike when a German Colonel ordered a massacre among civilians? Now, Israel allegedly threatens Iran with annihilation. Wasn’t it Hillary Clinton in the 2008 presidential election campaign who threatened Iran first (actually, she used “totally obliterate”)? What did he say then? Has Grass ever visited Iran? Its nuclear sites? Did he follow IAEA reports by ElBaradei, Amano?

Sickening hypocritical Günter Grass, a former member of Waffen-SS (we only got to know about that since he confessed in 2006 in one of his latest publications, Vom Häuten der Zwiebel, or Pealing the Onion; he explained this later in an article in The New Yorker) has now proved that he is nothing else than a petty anti-Semite. Warmongers in Israel and its government may in fact jubilee. They read, Was gesagt werden muss: The Jews are our calamity.

In particular disgusting is Grass’ publication of his poem just before the Jewish Passover festival, a common occasion for anti-Semitic denouncing Jewish life and rites.

To be just a bit instructive, what Netanjahu, Barak and Lieberman do and always did is a game. Virtuoso, they play the influence of the American Israel lobby in preparation of the November elections, no more. There will be no preemptive airstrike since its effectiveness and efficiency are highly questionable. There will be no nuclear attack on already heavily fortified enrichment facilities since these politicians are shrewd but not nuts.

Was gesagt werden muss

Warum schweige ich, verschweige zu lange,
was offensichtlich ist und in Planspielen
geübt wurde, an deren Ende als Überlebende
wir allenfalls Fußnoten sind.

Es ist das behauptete Recht auf den Erstschlag,
der das von einem Maulhelden unterjochte
und zum organisierten Jubel gelenkte
iranische Volk auslöschen könnte,
weil in dessen Machtbereich der Bau
einer Atombombe vermutet wird.

Doch warum untersage ich mir,
jenes andere Land beim Namen zu nennen,
in dem seit Jahren wenn auch geheimgehalten
ein wachsend nukleares Potential verfügbar
aber außer Kontrolle, weil keiner Prüfung
zugänglich ist?

Das allgemeine Verschweigen dieses Tatbestandes,
dem sich mein Schweigen untergeordnet hat,
empfinde ich als belastende Lüge
und Zwang, der Strafe in Aussicht stellt,
sobald er mißachtet wird;
das Verdikt „Antisemitismus“ ist geläufig.

Jetzt aber, weil aus meinem Land,
das von ureigenen Verbrechen,
die ohne Vergleich sind,
Mal um Mal eingeholt und zur Rede gestellt wird,
wiederum und rein geschäftsmäßig, wenn auch
mit flinker Lippe als Wiedergutmachung deklariert,
ein weiteres U-Boot nach Israel
geliefert werden soll, dessen Spezialität
darin besteht, allesvernichtende Sprengköpfe
dorthin lenken zu können, wo die Existenz
einer einzigen Atombombe unbewiesen ist,
doch als Befürchtung von Beweiskraft sein will,
sage ich, was gesagt werden muss.

Warum aber schwieg ich bislang?
Weil ich meinte, meine Herkunft,
die von nie zu tilgendem Makel behaftet ist,
verbiete, diese Tatsache als ausgesprochene Wahrheit
dem Land Israel, dem ich verbunden bin
und bleiben will, zuzumuten.

Warum sage ich jetzt erst,
gealtert und mit letzter Tinte:
Die Atommacht Israel gefährdet
den ohnehin brüchigen Weltfrieden?
Weil gesagt werden muss,
was schon morgen zu spät sein könnte;
auch weil wir – als Deutsche belastet genug –
Zulieferer eines Verbrechens werden könnten,
das voraussehbar ist, weshalb unsere Mitschuld
durch keine der üblichen Ausreden
zu tilgen wäre.

Und zugegeben: ich schweige nicht mehr,
weil ich der Heuchelei des Westens
überdrüssig bin; zudem ist zu hoffen,
es mögen sich viele vom Schweigen befreien,
den Verursacher der erkennbaren Gefahr
zum Verzicht auf Gewalt auffordern und
gleichfalls darauf bestehen,
daß eine unbehinderte und permanente Kontrolle
des israelischen atomaren Potentials
und der iranischen Atomanlagen
durch eine internationale Instanz
von den Regierungen beider Länder zugelassen wird.

Nur so ist allen, den Israelis und Palästinensern,
mehr noch, allen Menschen, die in dieser
vom Wahn okkupierten Region
dicht bei dicht verfeindet leben
und letztlich auch uns zu helfen.

(All orthographic, linguistic and stylistic errors as such.)

See a not scrutinized translation here.

Last update April 5, 2012

Read Full Post »

When Saudi Arabian tanks, on invitation of Bahrain’s King Hamad Al Khalifa, invaded the tiny Gulf island on March 14, what has been called the Arab Spring uprisings had their heyday. Tunisia’s dictator Zine El Abidine Ben Ali had fled to Saudi Arabia on 14 January, his Egyptian counterpart Hosni Mubarak had resigned on 11 February. Libya’s Muammar Qaddafi had turned his tanks against his own protesting citizens; and NATO was about, in official terms, to implement the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1973 calling the international community for establishing a “no-fly zone”, which had led to another illegal war in the greater Middle East (ironically, Germany abstained in the final UNSC vote and was heavily criticized afterwards; but wait a minute). While huge protests are seen up to now in Yemen and Syria, those in Algeria, Jordan, Oman, even Kuwait have been brought under control. Deceptive graveyard peace.

It is not clear whether then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, who had visited Bahrain only hours before Saudi Arabian tanks were deployed across the King Fahd Causeway had only discussed, with Al Khalifa, the possibility of letting Saudi troops and others from the Gulf Cooperation Council invade protect Bahrain, home of U.S. Navy’s Fifth Fleet. Or whether he had in fact given a green light. Obama, whose historic but hollow speech in Cairo two years ago has echoed all over the region, has long been disgracefully reluctant in supporting the struggle for democracy. In his remarks on the uprising a couple of weeks ago (“Moments of Opportunity”, but for whom?), he culpably did not mention Saudi Arabia and he called the severely oppressed Shi’a majority in Bahrain a religious minority. He even stressed that,

“Not every country will follow our particular form of representative democracy, and there will be times when our short-term interests don’t align perfectly with our long-term vision for the region.” (Emphasis added.)

For the Obama administration, the whole uprising came at the wrong time, one might have in mind. He might even have stabbed the people of the Middle East in the back.

German news magazine Der Spiegel had reported this week that Germany is about to secretly sell 200 fully armored Leopard 2A7+ battle tanks to Saudi Arabia. Yesterday’s  parliamentary debate ended in a debacle for the center-right government. Many opposition leaders consider the deal illegal since it violates German guidelines that forbid export of weapons to regimes that violate human rights and to regions facing military crisis. Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière refused to even confirm the deal, pointing to classified debates in the “Federal Security Council”. Lawmakers then departed for the summer break.

According to anonymous sources both the U.S. and, well, Israel, Saudi Arabia’s arch enemy, had approved the deal.

That Germany’s wavering government may be involved in barely legal tanker deals with Saudi Arabia, a country with a disastrous human rights record exporting Islamic fundamentalism and terrorists for several decades at a time when it becomes crystal clear that the Kingdom is desperately trying to scotch any democracy movement in its own territory and the whole region tells volumes about Merkel’s, Westerwelle’s and de Maiziére’s intentions.

Leader of Christian Democrats Parliamentary group Volker Kauder defended the deal , without confirming it either, in Germany’s public broadcaster’s morning show, by naming the usual foes, Al Qaeda in the Yemen and Iran working on a nuclear bomb. The deal, if it does exist, “serves stabilizing the region”.  

Last modification July 9, 2011.

Read Full Post »

That Germany’s Minister of Defense Baron Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg abdicated today was foreseeable, and inevitable. His doctoral thesis was plagiarism which is considered as grave scientific misconduct. That Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel, who holds a PhD in science and is married to a German Professor in science, was allegedly short-taken by zu Guttenberg’s resignation today has to come as a surprise. One should assume that she had known the rules. A betraying Defense Minister is not acceptable.

It’s interesting to note that Germany’s weekly DER SPIEGEL once again won a battle with Germany’s no. 1 tabloid BILD which had favored gutsy zu Guttenberg until his bitter end.  The former’s reporters downed zu Guttenberg today as they fired off former Federal President Horst Köhler in May 2010. Well done.

 

Last modified March 2, 2011.

Read Full Post »

The two reporters of German tabloid BamS, Marcus Hellwig and Jens Koch, which had been sentenced to 20 months in prison on charges on “acting against national security” for illicitly entering Iran on tourist visas have been freed yesterday. Their sentence had been commuted to fines of $50’000 each. Koch and Hellwig had tried to interview Sakineh Mohammadi-Ashtiani’s son in Tabriz in October 2010 and were arrested by Iranian authorities. Ms. Ashtiani’s case has caused international fury and concern after she had been sentenced to death by stoning for alleged adultery. While the stoning sentence had been suspended in the meantime, execution by hanging for complicity in her husband’s assassination is still imminent.

The international press hails German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle who had made it to Tehran to personally pick up Koch and Hellwig.  In the meantime, Iran’s government-controlled broadcasting service presstv reports of a rare photo session of Westerwelle with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The meeting took place “in the early hours of Sunday morning,” presumably at 3 am. Westerwelle is thus the first western politician who actually met with Ahmadinejad. No kudos, definitely.

There are certain despots one should not join at any table. Ahmadinejad has organized an infamous “holocaust conference” in Tehran to which he had invited well-known holocaust deniers in order “to discuss and question” historical facts about the holocaust. His demagogic and notorious remarks on Israel have earned him a disastrous reputation of an inconvincible anti-Semite. His re-election in 2009 is widely regarded illegitimate. Westerwelle’s humiliation of sitting next to poorly dressed-up Ahmadinejad at a table in his office being forced of agreeing to the President’s world views cannot be more disturbing.

Is that the price for tolerating poor and illicit journalism? Koch and Hellwig will report about their “adventures” in the prison in Tabriz soon. Meanwhile, the huge damage for the German Foreign Ministry can hardly be assessed in full right now.

 

Last modified February 20, 2011.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.