Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘USA’ Category

outofsight-outofmind

As Noam Chomsky has described earlier this year President Obama’s drone war on terror in Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Yemen and several other countries as just a “global assassination campaign”, designers at Pitch Interactive have now described every known attack by the US since 2004 in a stunning, well shocking, interactive graph and movie using data from the the Bureau of Investigative Journalism. Accordingly, a mere 1.5% of high profile targets were killed while 175 casualties were children and 535 civilians.

You may see the video here.

27 March 2013 @ 6:45 pm.

Last modified March 27, 2013.

Read Full Post »

It’s ten years after G.W. Bush and his allies (UK, Australia and a “coalition of the willing”) attacked Iraq and quickly toppled Saddam Hussein’s regime. The war was illegal, weapons of mass destruction have never been found, at least 130,000 Iraqis have been killed, millions displaced. Torture in detention centers, abuse in Abu Ghuraib and elsewhere. The Iraq War Logs, leaked by Bradley Manning and published by WikiLeaks and major main stream media in 2010, must be regarded one of the most significant documents of our time, and its full analysis will take more years if not decades. Responsible figures such as Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Blair and others are now retired, never indicted for any war crimes at least in their own countries, but elsewhere, sure.

I’ve just read again my personal account five years after bombing of Baghdad which I had written when memories were still vivid. I want to share these thoughts once again here.

BACK FROM SAN ANTONIO

(First published on March 19, 2008)

These days, the so far 3rd war (not the second!) in the Gulf region marks its 5th anniversary. The operation was called Shock & Awe and I was watching the bombing of Baghdad live on my TV in a flat in Kuwait. Incredible, Baghdad and its avenues at the Tigris river were brightly illuminated when the first bombs blasted! It looked more like a Hollywood movie. How could that be broadcast to the World? While we were sitting here in a totally dark, blacked-out Kuwait!

I really can tell, I was shocked and awed. We had spent the last days before the outbreak of war with shopping of the special kind, hoarding meat, tuna fish and vegetables in cans, getting large amounts of rice and noodles, buying candles.

Our former Faculty Dean had briefed the brave of us, who were about to stay, in one of the then rare Faculty meetings: There might be curfews in Kuwait. The Americans troops will be in Baghdad within 72 hours. University will be closed for a week or so. Life will go on. But the women were free to leave Kuwait for some time, of course.

A couple of days earlier, a Scandinavian colleague had proudly presented his gas mask which the German Embassy had lent him. Scandinavians do not have their own Embassies in Kuwait. When making a telephone call to the Embassy, the most helpful Ms Lorenz there, who had served the quickly changing German Ambassadors for 30 years or so, calmed me down. But maybe taping of the windows would be a good idea.

I had arrived from a scientific meeting in San Antonio already on the 12th of March 2003. I had made my final decision of coming back to Kuwait only at the airport in Frankfurt, when I had met our Vice Dean and another chairman of our Faculty. The three of us had the same thoughts but didn’t tell: Okay, these guys are also going back to Middle East!

The flight from Frankfurt to Kuwait City was horrible, a nightmare. The airspace was already closed over Iraq. Instead of taking the direct route from the Balkans, Turkey, Iraq to Kuwait, we had to fly over Jeddah at the eastern coastline of the Red Sea, then cross the whole Arabian Peninsula and Rhub Al Khali, then towards Bahrain, and then back to Kuwait. The plane was shaken by an enormous sandstorm between the tiny island in the Gulf and Kuwait and I almost had to say my final prayers. It was the first in a series of nearly weekly sandstorms which hit Kuwait later until May.

In Kuwait, it turned out that I had lost my luggage, and I had it back only after several weeks. Lufthansa had stopped flying to the Middle East, no way to go there during the war operations. I was promised, it would be safer in Frankfurt.

For one week we were advised not to drive in Kuwait by car, to stay at home and listen to any alerts. There were 20 or so, and one missile hit in fact the sea close to the Sultan Center in Souq Sharq. No casualties, fortunately. No poison gas either. Were there any shelters? We were at least not informed. Indeed, University was closed only for a week or so, and then life went on. The numerous, weekly sandstorms were most probably caused by military operations in the North. Embedded journalists (with questionable professional ethics) reported from what seems to be a big adventure every day. People in Basrah did not welcome the British troops, but when Baghdad was taken, we saw pictures of delighted inhabitants waving and dancing in the streets. An ugly statue of Saddam in Firdos Square was toppled already in early April. But Bush’s declaration of the end of military action on May 1, 2003 on aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln (“Mission accomplished”) turned out to be an illusion. Abu Ghuraib, only one year later, changed everything. The emerging civil war in Iraq led millions of people flee to neighboring countries, if they could. Some said that about 1 million civilians have died in the meantime, but figures may have been overestimated. The Iraqi body count may be found here.

In the meantime, the head of the U.S. Central Command, Admiral William “Fox” (another desert fox) Fallon, has resigned after having given the Esquire an interview (which will appear next month). There were heavy disputes, of course, with the Commander-in-Chief on Iraq and Iran policies, and even with his General Petraeus, who had reported (and is about to report again) on the successful ‘surge’, gated communities in Baghdad, and a general better life in Baghdad and Iraq. Right now, presidential candidate John McCain visits the site, and soon Vice President Dick Cheney will arrive for respective celebrations.

What to say five years after the U.S.-led invasion to end years of dictatorship? We wish the Iraqi people a better future, honestly. And, the last the world could afford is another military conflict in the region.

Further information here.

16 March 2013 @ 9:25.

Last modified March 16, 2013.

Read Full Post »

That Bradley Manning had unavailingly contacted the Washington Post, the New York Times and, almost, Politico, before providing WikiLeaks with hundreds of thousands of classified documents including diplomatic cables of US embassies around the world and the notorious Collateral Murder video of the Apache helicopter massacre in Baghdad in 2007 showing the killing of at least twelve, mainly civilian, people, comes as a big surprise from the pretrial hearing in Fort Meade where he for the first time took “full responsibility” for the leak, as Spencer Ackerman of Wired reports. This may be more even more amazing as Washington Post journalists, Joshua Partlow and David Finkel, had already reported on the Apache helicopter incident in 2007. As Paul Adams at BBC reports, he said, “[t]he most alarming aspect of the video to me was the seemingly delightful bloodlust the aerial weapons team happened to have.” He compared the troops to children “torturing ants with a magnifying glass”. It would be important to get to know who Manning had actually contacted at the Washington Post to interest her in the Iraq and Afghanistan documents and who did not take “him seriously”.

Manning denied that he was compromising national security although he conceded that many of the diplomatic cables would be embarrassing. He pleaded guilty to ten of 22 charges, among them “to improperly storing classified information; having unauthorized possession of such information; willfully communicating it to an unauthorized person.” He pleaded not-guilty to 12 more charges , including “aiding the enemy and disseminating any information that he believed could harm U.S. national security.”

How it was possible that a 22-yr-old intelligence analyst and, well, outcast at “Forward Operating Base Hammer” in Iraq could access, investigate, spirit away and then leak at least half a million military and diplomatic documents (which, according to Manning, were available to “thousands” of people throughout the U.S. government) and videos has not been publicly assessed so far. The case of Bradley Manning, according to many one of the heroes of our time, is made up solely to make an example of what will happen if that happens again. His own motives for the leak are utterly noble. He “believed, and still believe… [the leaked documents] are some of the most significant documents of our time.” What he wants to reveal is, in his words, “war porn” like the Apache helicopter video.  As so many, he does not feel comfortable with the situation of Guantanamo where “we found ourselves holding an increasing number of individuals indefinitely.”

If he had been the contact person at WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, whose name he apparently mispronounced throughout the hearing, had apparently not revealed his identity. Manning said, that no one at WikiLeaks had ever encouraged him to leak.

Well, whether that will help Assange or whether Manning’s  confession of the lesser charges will ultimately spare him up to 20 years in prison is uncertain after all.

1 March 2013 @ 11:30 am.

Last modified March 1, 2013.

Read Full Post »

Wireds Danger Room’s Noah Shachtman drew last week world-wide attention to an airbase under construction in the Arabian desert Rub’ Al Khali near the border to Yemen. He speculated that this might have been the  American drone base from which American citizens Anwar al-Awlaki and his son, as well as Samir Khan had been assassinated in September and October 2011. Prior to that, the Washington Post had prepared its readers,

“The Post learned Tuesday night that another news organization was planning to reveal the location of the base, effectively ending an informal arrangement among several news organizations that had been aware of the location for more than a year (emphasis added),”

which is the real scandal. Wired had become quite infamous in the Bradley Manning case when one of its reporters computer hackers who had been contacted by email by Manning in May 2010 had betrayed him to the FBI a couple of days later who had then been arrested immediately. So, the two ex-officers who talked to Shachtman should be on alert. Whistle-blowing is heavily prosecuted under Obama’s administration. Shachtman writes,

“But a pair of former American intelligence officers tell Danger Room that they are reasonably sure that this is the base revealed by the media earlier this week.

‘I believe it’s the facility that the U.S. uses to fly drones into Yemen,’ one officer says. ‘It’s out in eastern Saudi Arabia, near Yemen and where the bad guys are supposed to hang out. It has those clamshell hangars, which we’ve seen before associated with U.S. drones.’

The former officer was also impressed by the base’s remote location. ‘It’s way, way out in the Rub al Khali, otherwise known as Hell, and must have been built, at least initially, with stuff flown into Sharorah and then trucked more than 400 kilometers up the existing highway and newly-built road,’ the ex-officer adds in an e-mail. ‘It’s a really major logistics feat. The way it fits inconspicuously into the terrain is also admirable.’”

Well, not really. The region seems to be replete with air bases, as cryptome.org knows. Besides Um Al Melh (the one revealed by Shachtman), another one just 8 km south to the border to Yemen, apparently Oyba Al Badie according to Cryptome, can easily be identified in Google Earth.

Oyba Al Badie

As Cryptome writes,

“Comparison of several Saudi Arabia and Yemen border guard airports with the base identified by Wired as a possible CIA drone base shows that the Wired base is markedly more complex with dual runways — the main one longer — with hangars and extensive support structures lacking in the existing simpler bases.

This suggests that the Saudis may have named the Wired base as a border guard base to camouflage Saudi participation in the drone program with drone launch capabilities inserted into border guard functions.

However, with the US-assisted global spread of drone use, the Saudis may well have added drone capabilities to its border defense in response to the rise in Al Qaeda threats from Yemen.”

The site displays satellite images of numerous air bases in the (Saudi) Arabian desert (most having been taken around 2007, long before the reported (by Wired) late 2010/early 2011 start of construction of the CIA drone base). But drone launch platforms do not need airports.

“Drone launch platforms are likely to increase at airports, air strips, highways, roads, fields, dry lake beds, prairies, flat mountain tops, ice fields, from whereever aircraft have traditionally gone aloft. As drones decrease and increase in size it should be expected that launch sites will proliferate in benign dual-use locations to cloak their operation.”

12 February 2013 @ 8:33 am.

Last modified February 12, 2013.

Read Full Post »

The probably intentionally leaked, to NBC, informal so-called White_Paper by the Department of Justice (DoJ) titled “Lawfulness [sic!] of a Lethal Operation Directed Against a U.S. Citizen Who is a Senior Operational Leader of Al-Qa’ida or An Associated Force” justifying the targeted killing of American citizens Anwar al-Awlaki and his 16-yr old son and Samir Khan, in Yemen in September 2011 by drone airstrikes seems to amend the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment which reads,

“No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.”

In the White Paper the DoJ concludes that  “a U.S. operation using lethal force in a foreign country against a U.S. citizen who is a senior operational leader of al-Qa’ida or an associated force would be lawful” where the following three conditions are met:

“(1) an informed, high level official of the U.S. government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States; (2) capture is infeasible, and the United States continues to monitor whether capture becomes feasible; and (3) the operation would be conducted in a manner consistent with applicable law of war principles.”

Of course, if one reads the Fifth Amendment carefully it presupposes “in time of War or public danger” (which was not the case in the Yemen assassination but that may be disputed).

While cowardly having not touched America’s Constitution’s Second Amendment yet, after the Newtown school shooting in December,

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”

but seriously impeding Freedom of Press when it comes to unwelcome leaks so far granted by the First Amendment,

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances,”

law professor President Obama just continues bending America’s Constitution. It may come to one’s mind that an amendment of the above first condition, “an informed, high level official of the U.S. government has determined that the targeted individual poses an imminent threat of violent attack against irreversibly damaging the international reputation the United States,” could apply. No irresponsible drone attacks are needed in that case, just impeachment.

6 February 2013 @ 6: 54 am.

Last modified February 6, 2013.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.