Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘Israel’

Two years ago, I had written a brief essay on Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) mystic Night Journey to Jerusalem and then further into Heaven which is commemorated by many Muslims today, 27 Rajab, al-’Isrā’ wal-Mi‘rāj. According to the Holy Qur’an (Q17:1) and aḥādīth the Prophet was taken to the “furthest mosque”, al-masjid al-aqsa,by al-Buraq, the mythical white-winged mare, and ascended to heaven from the Rock on the Temple Mount. The journey took place about one year before the Prophet’s hijra, 621 CE, and he testified afterwards to the Quraysh of Makkah what he had seen in Jerusalem.  But what had he actually seen?

Fact of the matter is that during a rather short period of time, between 614 and 629, Christian almost three centuries long control over Jerusalem had been adjourned by Persian rule. In 614 Jerusalem had been besieged for 21 days by the army of Shah Khosrau II’s General Sharbaraz and after the city’s surrender most Christian inhabitants were massacred and all churches destroyed. Even the True Cross was taken as a trophy to the Capital Ctesiphon. But Persian reign lasted only until 629 when the Byzantine emperor Heraclius reconquered the city and returned the True Cross to the rebuilt Holy Sepulchre.

What the Prophet of Islam might have seen when for the first and last time in Jerusalem I had mainly derived from Oleg Grabar’s book on early Islamic Jerusalem, The Shape of the Holy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey 1996) which provides some computer-generated images of the city around 600 CE, one and a half decade before the Persian conquest. One has to assume that in 621, the year of the mystical Night Journey, the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, the Church of Resurrection, and the Church on Mt. Zion commemorating the Last Supper and the large Church Nea Ekklesia of the Theotokos lay in ruins.

A few decades after the Muslim conquest of Jerusalem in 638 CE, around 700 CE, the Umayyad Caliphs Abd’ al-Malik and his son al-Walid erected, in commemoration of Muhammad’s Night Journey, the Dome of the Rock (from where he ascended to Heaven) and the al-Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount, the site of Solomon’s First and post-Babylonian exile Second Temple, and Herod’s reconstruction which had finally been destroyed in 135 CE by the troops of Roman Emperor Hadrian.

Oleg Grabar, who has deceased last year, has co-edited with Benjamin Z. Kedar of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Where Heaven and Earth Meets: Jerusalem’s Sacred Esplanade (Yad Ben-Zvi Press, Jerusalem and the University of Texas Press, Austin, Texas 2009) which assembles an impressive panel of Christian, Jewish and Muslim scholars who present many unknown facts in three thousand years’ history and stunningly illuminate the unique historical, religious, spiritual, cultural, and political importance of this true interface between, focus of, the three monotheistic, revealed, religions (the not less-charged significance for Christians is derived from Jesus’ relation with and acts in Herod’s Temple). The for Jews significant Western Wall of the Esplanade is not forgotten in the account.

Due to the unsolved political situation of Israel occupying East Jerusalem, al-Haram al-Sharif, the Noble Sanctuary, is seriously endangered. But there is hope. Grabar, in a personal statement concludes:

“There are legal and technical mechanisms for the preservation of what is deemed beautiful and historically significant, but the implementation of these mechanisms requires decisions about governance and responsibility which cannot be exclusively in the hands of political and religious authorities. Alternate possibilities, through UNESCO for instance, have failed so far. But, if one mediates on the eschatological component of the Haram as the space where Go[o]d will be made prevail and man will be judged, one can perhaps imagine that a space shaped by the Antique world long gone and constantly enhanced by the living culture of Islam could become a place for reconciliation and mutual understanding rather than of strife and contest. Hope springs eternal.” (Emphasis added.)

 

June 17, 2012 @ 17:20

Last modified June 17, 2012.

 

Read Full Post »

While, after Jeffrey Goldberg’s lengthy article last week, a heated debate at The Atlantic currently discusses pros and cons of bombing Iran and its nuclear facilities, and former Ambassador to the UN John Bolton warns that Israel and the US are going to miss an almost historical chance to destroy the Bushehr light water reactor before it is loaded with fuel provided by Russia years ago, Iran’s sole leader in all domestic and international matters, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has made yesterday clear that the country will not engage in any talks with the USA under threats and sanction. Snubbing once more his president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Khamenei said,

“On one hand they threaten us and impose sanctions and show an iron hand, and on the other hand they want us at the negotiating table. We do not consider this as negotiations.

“Experience has shown that when they cannot answer logic, they bully… we will not budge under pressures and we will respond to these pressures in our own way.”

Bombing the Bushehr reactor is a particularly stupid suggestion, as Juan Cole wrote yesterday. The 1,000 megawatt Bushehr reactor should even be considered a confidence-building measure of the Iranians as it is highly unlikely that this nuclear plant, closely inspected by the International Atomic Energy Agency, can be misused for any illicit military purposes. Russia provides, according to the agreement for 10 years, low-enriched uranium, and spent fuel will be taken back to Russia. Even former president G. W. Bush had endorsed the deal in 2007 since it considerably reduced Iran’s demands for its own enrichment program. That Iran continues enrichment has much to do with the numerous delays in the construction of the power plant which was originally scheduled to be completed in 1999. Russia, which had agreed to construct the reactor in 1995, also needs to build confidence here.  

That Khamenei, on the eve of one of the country’s greatest nuclear triumphs after decades of backlashes, won’t signal the Obama administration that Iran is willing to buckle under threats and sanctions does certainly not come as a surprise.

It’s amazing that they have not even learned the basic lessons how to deal with the Iranians.

 

Last update August 19, 2010.

Read Full Post »

Two nuclear bombings and an incredible number of nuclear tests between 1945 and 1998 with the emerging of new nuclear powers. The test on 9 October 2006 by North Korea has obviously not been taken seriously, neither has been that in September 1977 which was conducted by apartheid regime South Africa probably in collaboration with Israel, the so-called Vela Incident.

 

Thanks to The New Yorker.

Last update August 9, 2010.

Read Full Post »

Clashes between Jews and Palestinians on the occasion of Purim are commonplace. In Hebron, or rather Al Khalil in the West Bank, they seem to escalate these days since the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has announced that he wanted the so called Cave of Machpelah, i.e., Abraham’s tomb, to be included in his national heritage plan. Juan Cole, who gave today an excellent overview on the origins of Purim celebrations on Adar 14 and 15, and, in particular, the non-historicity of stories about the Patriarch Abraham, calls it differently: a prelude of the annexation of Al-Khalil to Israel.

Purim commemorates the, as legend tells, last-minute avoidance of genocide among the Jewish minority in Achaemenid, i.e., Zoroastrian, Persia. The plot, which might have been written in the 2nd or 3rd century BCE, features Jewish Queen Esther, her cousin Mordecai and their adversary, Minister Haman, who plans to execute the latter for his refusal of paying tribute, and to exterminate all Jews in the kingdom. Esther informed her husband about conspiracy and announced genocide. The king became outrageous, first hanged Haman then guaranteed the Jews two days exemption from punishment to retaliate upon their enemies. The Book of Esther reports that the Jews killed 75’000 Persians in another genocide.

Purim celebrations are usually provocative, in particular in the West Bank. Settlers were seen singing, dancing and drinking alcohol, and mocking the Palestinians who comprise the vast majority of inhabitants in Hebron/Al Khalil. One has to take into consideration that Muslim revere Abraham, or Prophet Ibrahim, as father of Ismail, ancestor of all Arabs, the friend of God, or khalilullah. Juan Cole tells that the Cave of the Patriarchs had been shown by Jews who were living in Hebron to the first Muslims who had conquered the Holy Land in 638. Jews had essentially welcomed the Muslims since they had heavily been suppressed by the Christian majority.

Purim celebrations are usually provocative, in particular in the West Bank. Settlers were seen singing, dancing and drinking alcohol, and mocking the Palestinians who comprise the vast majority of inhabitants in Hebron/Al Khalil. One has to take into account that Muslim revere Abraham, or Prophet Ibrahim, as father of Ismail, ancestor of all Arabs, the friend of God, or khalilullah. Juan Cole tells that the Cave of the Patriarchs had been shown by Jews who were living in Hebron to the first Muslims who had conquered the Holy Land in 638. Jews had essentially welcomed the Muslims since they had heavily been suppressed by the Christian majority.

Provocative acts usually lead to retaliation especially when parties are unforgiving. Another site in focus, Al Haram As-Sharif in Jerusalem, has seen yesterday new clashes between Muslim worshippers and security forces which have to be seen as directly related to Purim. King Abdullah II of Jordan warned that “Israel’s provocative aggressions on Al-Aqsa would have dangerous repercussions.” Since 691 CE, the Temple Mount is dominated by the Dome of the Rock, which contains the site on which allegedly the Prophet Muhammad ascended to heaven, Abraham had been distracted from sacrificing his own son, and even Adam had been created; and Al-Aqsa, the ‘farthest Mosque’, as the Qur’an describes it in surah 17:1. Again, all of this qualifies the site as holy for all three Monotheisms.

 

See also on this blog:

Palestine Wiped Off the Map

Simon Peres

Last update March 1, 2010

Read Full Post »

When the Swedish industrialist and inventor of dynamite Alfred Nobel (1833-1896) endowed his award for peace in 1895 he had a person in mind “who shall have done the most of the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.” In contrast to the awards in science, medicine and literature (and, since 1969, economics) which are presented in Stockholm, the peace price and its laureate’s lecture are traditionally presented at the annual Prize Award Ceremony in Oslo, Norway. In 1895, Sweden and Norway were still in union and Sweden was responsible for foreign politics. When formulating his will, Nobel felt that the Peace Prize might be less subject to political corruption if awarded by Norway.

The Norwegian Parliament appoints the Norwegian Nobel Committee which selects each year’s Laureate for the Peace Prize. Nominations are invited from qualified people around the world. Nominations must be submitted to the Committee by February 1. That means that  there was a deadline about 10 days after this year’s Laureate Barack Obama had been sworn in as the 44th President of the United States of America. However, nominations by committee members can be submitted up to the date of the first committee meeting. Most probably, Barack Obama was nominated by a member of the committee. This year’s committee consists of the chairman Thorbjørn Jagland (President of the Norwegian Parliament, member since 2009, b. 1950) and four women, Kaci Kullmann Five (b. 1951), Sissel Marie Rønbeck (b. 1950), Inger-Marie Ytterhorn (b. 1941), and Ågot Valle (member since 2009, b. 1945).

This year, a record of 205 nominations have been submitted to the committee, but names of nominees are generally not revealed to the public. Among individuals whose name appeared as possible nominees was brave Mehdi Karroubi, the defeated opposition candidate in Iran’s disputed June 12 election who debunked the scandal of torture and rape of detained protesters in Iranian prisons. This initiative of activists came definitely too late when considering the strict rules for nominations. His Iranian fellow, lawyer and peace activist Shirin Ebadi made it in 2003. Her Peace Prize is one of the most precious awards ever, since her continuing work for freedom and her selfless legal assistance for political and religious dissidents in Iran has saved innumerable lives so far.

Even Barack Obama himself would probably have more welcomed a decision in favor of Chicago as the organizer of the 2016 Olympics than this grave honor, a burden for his future politics. While the rightists in the US are howling, even ridiculing Obama’s award it is clear that the Norwegian decision is based on unjustified expectations and naïve wish-full thinking. Putting the world’s tremendous problems on his agenda, which have been caused by the irresponsible foreign and domestic politics of Americas previous rulers is not worthy a Nobel Peace Prize, nor is giving, admittedly important, speeches. Credible and responsible diplomacy is a matter of course.

The award arouses the suspicion that, presently, there are no worthy alternatives (despite the record number of 205 nominees this year), accountable individuals or organizations working for peace with measurable results. If true (we don’t know Obama’s competitors though), this would in fact be very bad news in times of two not yet finished wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, apparently unsolvable conflicts in the Middle East, an ongoing crisis in and about Iran, and a global economic slowdown. Will Ben Bernanke be awarded the Economic Prize this year?

I rather believe that the committee in Oslo has not done its work properly. That the Nobel Peace Price should be awarded independent of potential political influence doesn’t mean that a committee of a tiny country in the northwestern corner of Europe may become big in politics.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.