Conditional Surrender

In unison, international media in the U.S. and Europe have declared Iran the virtual winner of the current war with the United States. Donald Trump himself had made miserable appearances at the G7 in Evian and Versailles in France and continues posting, on his platform, Truth Social, threats towards Iran, which has several times in the past days declared the Strait of Hormuz again closed (as Israel continues bombing Lebanon).

While in negotiations with the U.S. in the luxury hotel at Lake Lucerne, the Iranian delegation was even threatened by Trump of being abducted (or even assassinated) if Iran does not convince its proxy in Lebanon (the Hizbollah) “not to cause trouble” anymore. Despite, again, progress in the talks. This is utterly reminiscent of what had happened in Geneva on the eve of 28 February when Israel and the U.S. started their unprovoked war.

The Iranian delegation (led by Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and Speaker of the Parliament Mohammed Bagher Ghalibaf) so far, sticks to the Memorandum of Understanding, where, in item #1, Lebanon is mentioned three times. For Iran, ceasefire in Lebanon is a prerequisite for further implementation.

I suppose, both Trump and his Vice President, J.D. Vance, who leads, this time, the American delegation, know what is at stake. And, despite Trump’s threats, rants, insults, the Iranians play along albeit remain principled.

Interestingly, Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei, has posted, on X, the following.

As you have been informed, a memorandum of understanding was signed between the presidents of Iran and the United States of America. In the course of reaching this stage, the officials in charge, out of sincere concern and goodwill, made extensive efforts—and of course, it was the American president who, out of desperation, used all kinds of leverage to bring this about.

I, as a matter of principle, held a different view [on the MoU]; however, out of the commitment that the esteemed president—as the head of the Supreme National Security Council—gave to me on his own behalf and on behalf of the other members regarding the safeguarding of the rights of the Iranian nation and the Resistance Front, and his explicit acceptance of that responsibility, I granted my permission.

He also explicitly stated that if the American side seeks to make excessive demands, they will not submit to them. From this moment on, we—that is, you, the proud nation, and this humble servant—will await the realization of the aforementioned conditions.

However, it’s self-evident that the in-person negotiations in the future will not mean acceptance of the enemy’s position. We hope the blessed prayers of our Master (may God hasten his noble reappearance) will bring all kinds of victories and triumphs to honorable Iranian nation. … (Emphasis added.)

Mojtaba Khamenei apparently holds a different view on the MoU. But he granted permission, for the officials in charge under Iranian President, Masoud Pezeshkian reached this stage “out of sincere concern and goodwill.” Hardliners in Tehran might be distrustful of what is happening right now in Switzerland.

Iran and its people continue to face severe problems. The war has certainly aggravated what has already been endemic in all these years under endurance. The economic crisis has deepened to a point where real famine is becoming reality. The ecological disaster is serious, in particular the water crisis. Iran’s infrastructure has severely been damaged. Overt protests out of dissatisfaction of the common population with the regime have been muted as brutal crackdowns are feared as well as torture and executions.

Donald Trump may well be right to view the new Iranian leadership as more rational. They could easily forgo the development of nuclear weapons—and perhaps even the policy of nuclear ambiguity, that is, the capability to produce a nuclear warhead on short notice if the need arose. In Trump, they have found someone who appreciates the grand ideas of their adversaries—such as closing the Strait of Hormuz. Trump is eager to share in the spoils.

So, Iran’s surrender is that of a proud nation. A conditional one. May the delegation safely return to Tehran.

22 June 2026 @ 11:19 UTC+2.

Last modified June 2026.

Posted in Iran | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hegseth in Brussels

Only one day after President Donald Trump had left France and returned to the White House, his Secretary of War (Congress approval for the change in name pending) met with his colleagues in NATO’s headquarters in Brussels, Belgium.

I am quite sure everyone has experienced, when in an employment, what may be called a dressing-down by his/her boss. Every employee of course tries to avoid this but it seems to be inevitable in any career. You either leave, are fired, or improve your performance.

A wise boss will offer you opportunities to save face (as long as the misdemeanor isn’t too grave and he/she rather wants to get rid of you). The scolding is generally be done behind closed doors. It is considered confidential.

As for NATO and the various defense secretaries of past US administrations, I am quite certain that relevant meetings took place both as a matter of routine and in response to international crises—for instance, when Article 5 of the NATO Treaty was invoked after September 11, 2001, or when Vladimir Putin’s Russia annexed Crimea in 2014, and in 2022 when Russia launched a full-scale war of aggression against Ukraine.

Certainly, these meetings were behind closed doors and their sensitive decisions were classified.

What Pete Hegseth did in Brussels was outrageously different. I have asked GeminiAI for an English expression for German, Einen Einlauf verpassen and was informed, To read someone the riot act may be fitting best.

It aligns, by the way, with J.D. Vance’s remarks at the Munich Security Conference in 2025 and Marco Rubio’s at the same venue in 2026. But publishing this verbal attack on his NATO colleagues on the White House website is a particularly egregious blunder. It is harmful, dangerous. Possibly treason.

When Hegseth does now maunder about NATO 1.0, 2.0, 3.0 — trying to provide a sense of history of the last 80 years—he confuses opportunities (the Fall of the Sowjet Empire and, what Francis Fukuyama called, The End of History) and backlashes (the rise of Islamic terrorism which culminated in 9/11 and the decades-long wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria. The so-called, by Trump, forever wars).

The former has indeed made it necessary for European leaders to re-consider its relationship with Russia, which possibly led to a fatal trivialisation of former KGB foreign intelligence officer, Vladimir Putin, who emerged as Russia’s new dictator since 2000. The latter, at least immediately after 9/11, was heavily supported by all NATO-members after the United States under President George W. Bush invoked for the first and only time Article 5. And, they led to unseen migrations of fugitives which European nations since then attempt to fend off, in accordance with the rule of law.

Continue reading
Posted in NATO, USA | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Hegseth in Brussels

Cognitive Dissonance Reduction

The location was steeped in history. The Treaty of Versailles of June 28, 1919, formally ended the First World War. Negotiated by the Allies as a dictated peace, it compelled the German Reich to acknowledge war guilt (Article 231), make massive territorial cessions (approximately 13% of its national territory), undergo demilitarization, and pay heavy reparations. It paved the way for the rise of Adolf Hitler, his Nazi party, the NSDAP, and ultimately WWII.

One hundred and seven years later, when President Donald Trump sighed, yesterday in Versailles signing the Memorandum of Understanding, “This was not easy!”, it was supposed to indicate a victory. The “boss” has spoken, and those at the table offered friendly applause. But everybody who reads the final text of the memorandum gets nothing but the feeling the United States surrendered to Iran.

In psychology, this is called cognitive dissonance reduction. Trump knows that he had made a big mistake out of frustration. He was shouting at Netanyahu, screaming at his military advisors, his plans to nuke Iran were talked out (it might not be true, though).

Continue reading
Posted in France, Iran, USA | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Trump Signs MoU in Versailles

Last night, when in Versailles on invitation by French President Emmanuel Macron, President Donald Trump had signed a copy of the latest version of the Memorandum of Understanding ending the war with Iran. “This was not easy!” he said. The document was also signed by the Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian as pictures published by state media showed.

Would it not have been more appropriate if Iran’s new Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei (whose father, wife and teenage son, among other family members) had been killed in the decapitation strike led by Trump and Netanyahu on February 28, had signed the agreement?

CNN reminds us that the place of the signature is the same as the ill-fated treaty ending WWI and setting in motion the rise of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany leading to WWII.

A Memorandum of Understanding is one of the weakest agreements one can think of. Until now, Trump has avoided to involve Congress, let alone the European allies or the United Nations Security Council. Although the former applauded the deal.

According to point 7 of the MoU, the lifting of all sanctions against Iran could be possible in the near future — whether based on UN Security Council or IAEA Board of Governors resolutions, or all unilateral US sanctions. Trump may believe that sanctions are the only way to prevent Iran of developing, “buying” or manufacturing nuclear weapons. Far from that.

Maybe he has not taken into account that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, presently more or less in power in Iran, was designated by the U.S. (via Trump himself) a Foreign Terrorist Organization, citing its extensive history of terrorist plots, hostage-taking, funding foreign terror networks, and killing U.S. citizen. The European Union formally added the IRGC to its terrorist list in February 2026. Canada, the UK, GulfStates Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, all consider th IRGC as a terrorist organization.

Continue reading
Posted in France, Iran, USA | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Leaked Memorandum of Understanding

CNN has received and published the so-called Iran deal to be signed, in an official ceremony, on Friday, 19 June, 2026 in central Switzerland. It is not clear, whether even President Donald Trump, who is still in France tonight, on President Macron’s invitation, to celebrate the 250th Birthday at Versailles.

1 — The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States, together with their allies in the current war, declare upon the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding an immediate and permanent end to the war on all fronts, including Lebanon, and undertake that from now on they will not launch any hostile action against each other, and will refrain from the threat or use of force against each other. The final agreement will confirm the provisions of this Article and the remaining Articles.

2 — The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States undertake to respect each other’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, and to refrain from interfering in each other’s internal affairs.

3  The Islamic Republic of Iran and the United States undertake to negotiate and reach a final agreement within a maximum period of 60 days, extendable by mutual consent.

4 — Immediately upon the signing of this Memorandum of Understanding, the United States lift the naval blockade and prevent any interference or obstruction against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and restore traffic within a maximum of 30 days to its full capacity; the traffic of ships shall be proportional to the pre-war volume of traffic on the part of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States also undertakes to withdraw its forces from the surrounding areas within 30 days after the final agreement.

5 — Upon signing this Memorandum of Understanding, the Islamic Republic of Iran will immediately take steps to ensure that the movement of merchant ships from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Oman and vice versa is resumed within 30 days to the pre-war volume, taking into account the need for the removal of technical obstacles and the neutralization of mines by Iran.

6 — The United States undertakes, together with its regional partners, to create a comprehensive plan agreed upon by both parties for the rehabilitation and economic development of the Islamic Republic of Iran, while ensuring financing of at least $300 billion. The implementation mechanism of this plan, as part of the final agreement, will be formulated within 60 days.

Continue reading
Posted in Iran, USA | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment